Kev I never implied that ISI financed the hijackers, you did. Theyre merely players who had inside access to the islamic extremist hood. I'm curious why do you think pakistan was responsible for funding hijackers? I believe it as the saudis who financed the attacks, why is this even a surprise to you? You know that the saudis have been the biggest financers of terrorism around the world for a long time. Nobody knew for sure who financed the 9/11 hijackers except for those who are inside the govt agencies until graham blew the whistle. Doesn't that make graham a whistlebloer? Because he has confirmed that a foreign govt was indeedy involved ith financing the hijackers yet didn't say who because it's been classified due to senstive information. Afterall why is us govt so reluctant to release the info to the public?
"Coincidently" the PBS interview with graham where he blew the whistle took place after this report came out...
Possible Saudi 9-11 Money Trail Probed
WASHINGTON, Nov. 23, 2002
"The Bush administration should be pushing the Saudis more to be helpful to our country. I think they need us more than we need them"
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.,
on a perceived lack of Saudi cooperation with congressional 9-11 probes
(CBS)
Allegations that money from the Saudi royal family indirectly helped two Sept. 11 hijackers mean a well-financed terrorist structure still could be in place in America, capable of striking again, lawmakers said Sunday.
A link between the Saudi government and the hijackers, if true, "raises the stakes substantially of what the threat is in the United States," said Democratic Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, outgoing chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Such a network could "facilitate the next wave of terror."
[/b]The White House on Saturday defended the FBI's handling of a diplomatically sensitive investigation into reports that Saudi Arabia provided money that helped support two of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
In its defense of the FBI, the Bush administration also denied another contention of some lawmakers - that the bureau has not done enough to examine fully the financing of the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi citizens.[/b]
Questions about the investigation could become troublesome for the administration, which is seeking the Saudis' help for a possible military campaign against their neighbor, Iraq. Saudi Arabia has been noncommittal, torn between its friendship with the United States and anti-war sentiment among the Arabs.
Members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, which are conducting a joint inquiry into the Sept. 11 attacks, expressed misgivings about the FBI investigation. Lawmakers believe the bureau has not examined vigorously the possibility that the Saudi government might have given money to two men who provided financial help to hijackers Khalif al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi.
A congressional aide, speaking to The Associated Press on Saturday on on condition of anonymity, said the issue is part of a broader concern that the
FBI has done too little overall to determine how last year's attacks were paid for and by whom.
Dan Bartlett, an administration spokesman who accompanied President Bush to a NATO summit in Europe, said the FBI has been investigating the possible Saudi link, "and I'm not going to prejudge the conclusion of that investigation."
"As anyone who knows this issue will tell you, it's very difficult to track financing of terrorist networks, because most of it is done in cash," he said. "I don't agree with the assessment it's not been aggressively pursued."
"It's important not to rush to judgment," a White House official told CBS News correspondent Mark Knoller.
Sen. Ron Wyden, a member of the Intelligence Committee, would not discuss details of the financing investigation but said, "So much of the focus on Iraq has clearly taken a toll with respect to some of the vigilance and oversight that needs to apply to others in the region."
He also said he has been dissatisfied with Saudi cooperation in the congressional investigation.
"I do think the administration should be pushing the Saudis more to be helpful to our country. I think they need us more than we need them," said Wyden, D-Ore.
A draft report by a joint congressional committee looking into the terrorist attacks says the CIA and FBI ignored the possibility that two of the hijackers, al-Midhar and al-Hazmi, both Saudis, were given Saudi money from two Saudi men they met in California in the year before the attacks, The New York Times reported in its Saturday editions.
The two, who both lived in San Diego for a time, were on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
The committee also accused the Saudi government of not fully cooperating with American investigators.
The two hijackers met with Omar al-Bayoumi and Osama Basnan, who were receiving financial support from the Saudi government, the Times said. Officials were not sure what kind of stipends they were receiving, the newspaper said.
Newsweek said, however, the FBI uncovered financial records showing payments to the family of al-Bayoumi from a Washington bank account held in the name of Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, wife of the Saudi ambassador to the United States and daughter of the late King Faisal.
Sources said the payments amounted to about $3,500 a month. The money filtered into the al-Bayoumi family's bank account in early 2000, just a few months after al-Midhar and al-Hazmi arrived in Los Angeles from an al Qaeda planning summit, Newsweek said in a report posted on its Web site Friday night.
Payments for roughly the same amount began flowing every month to Basnan.
Administration officials told Newsweek they did do not know the purpose of the payments from Princess Haifa's account. They also were uncertain whether the money was given to the hijackers by al-Bayoumi or Basnan.
A spokesman for the Saudi embassy told CBS News on Saturday that the students received no money from Princess Haifa's account, that the allegation is "absolutely not true," and that the Princess is prepared to cooperate fully with the investigation, according to CBS News correspondent John Roberts.
Cont. here
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in530654.shtml