Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Aug 24th, 2004, 04:14 PM        Military Service For Presidents
How many of you think that the constant comparison of military service (penis sizes) is just a diversionary mud slingling tactic used to disguise the fact that neither man's party has a real political plan that is particularly effective or different from the other?
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
davinxtk davinxtk is offline
GO AWAY DONT POST HERE
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up.
davinxtk is probably a spambot
Old Aug 24th, 2004, 05:10 PM       
I think they're focusing on the military service so they can avoid the absolutely dispicable bullshit that these two politicians have been involved in in the subsequent 30 years.


I also think that I'd rather have a president with zero military service, in fact. They might not be the most brilliant tactician, but they're also less likely to start a fight.
__________________
(1:02:34 AM): and i think i may have gone a little too far and let her know that i actually do hate her, on some level, just because she's female
(1:03:33 AM): and now she's being all kinds of sensitive about it
(1:03:53 AM): i hate women
Reply With Quote
  #3  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
El Blanco is probably a spambot
Old Aug 24th, 2004, 06:21 PM       
Well, one of the president's primary jobs is as Commander in Chief of the armed forces. I think experience in that field is something that should be considered, just not alone.

I'm not going to question Kerry's service record. If he earned those medals, then he should be proud. I just want to know how he is going to use those experiences as president. So far, if he is to be believed, he was a hell of a soldier, but I don't know what kind of civilian leader he is.
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
McMock McMock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In vain
McMock is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2004, 08:27 AM       
Just a detail - don't mean to imply that you didn't know this already. But both presidential candidates have very different plans. It's just that what they tell the people their plans are is so very alike. (And wouldn't you know it, what they tell the media is exactly what will score with the largest slice of the population. GASP!)

Bush had the plan to invade Iraq well before he became the president, but it did not show up in any of his speeches. Plan =/= the bullshit they vomit out into the airwaves.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Aug 25th, 2004, 05:10 PM       
I just find that it's human nature to throw in the red herring when you have no real argument. It's one of the more disappointing informal logic techniques. You would think that, as presidents (or one vying for president), that they could come up with something more creative.

I also like the way Bush gave the Swift Boat guys a couple of days airing before he made his statement about how reprehensible the message was.
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.