Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Feb 10th, 2006, 07:51 PM        Every economist ever is boring
QED.
__________________

SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Feb 10th, 2006, 08:52 PM       
I guess I'll be the first to ask how you came to that conclusion.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Feb 10th, 2006, 08:56 PM       
The historical/neoclassical school of thought has no means of isolating variables in the same manner that physical scientists do, thus rendering much of its exertion useless.

The a priori/Austrian school of thought relies on Kantian philosophy to give their "axioms" validity (I reject Kant, remember?).

All that being said, Austrian axioms can be inferred with great sucess (if you truly need to organize an argument for them, use induction with reference to an ordinal model of chance). However, the fact that I admit that economic postulates are not necessarily true causes me to have some severe breaks with Austrian reasoning.

For example, Rothbard's attack on utilitarianism/consequentialism is based on the assertion that we are unable to know utility in any context outside of our mind. However, I argue that I can infer utility (from induction with reference to ordinal chance) with varying degrees of success. For example, while inferring the utility of Play-Doh for an individual might be difficult, inferring the utility of food and water in the condition of starvation is much more successful. Rothbard relies on absolutes; I rely on likelihood. That man hates to starve is not much less likely than man acts.

Again, QED.
__________________

SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Feb 10th, 2006, 10:13 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helm
agree
Reply With Quote
  #5  
homoperfect homoperfect is offline
Member
homoperfect's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
homoperfect is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 09:35 PM       
my experience from working for MaryP.I.R.G. is quite the oposite. Though there scientific explinations were dull and probablly could be placed to better use at the national sleep institute. I can't deny that they know how to party. Just be prepared to make a trip to the recycling Center the following morning.
__________________
"Cogito ergo sum"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 09:47 PM       
PIRG sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Preechr Preechr is offline
=======
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
Preechr is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 10:49 PM       
I thought their second album was pretty good, but after that they kinda just sold out, y'know.
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?

How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
ItalianStereotype ItalianStereotype is offline
Legislacerator
ItalianStereotype's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: HELL, where all hot things are
ItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty ok
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 10:54 PM       
hm, yes, but are they gay?
__________________
I could just scream
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Preechr Preechr is offline
=======
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
Preechr is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 10:58 PM       
No. They are VERY Anti-Gay. It's actually a bit disturbing.

Maybe that's why he works for them. He is trying to change them from behind... or within... something like that.
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?

How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
MLE MLE is offline
CHIEF OF POLICE
MLE's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nice Chinese Restaurant
MLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty ok
Old Feb 25th, 2006, 10:59 PM       
Preechr gets jokes.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
homoperfect homoperfect is offline
Member
homoperfect's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
homoperfect is probably a spambot
Old Feb 26th, 2006, 02:03 AM       
Yeeeah, I no longer work for them. Environmental lobbyist groups are composed mainly of liberal wack jobs such as myself. The specific group I was with was rather accepting. But not too boring. as I said, be prepared to make a trip to the recycling center the following morning.
__________________
"Cogito ergo sum"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Feb 26th, 2006, 10:40 PM       
If you're trying to go for a Latin sn, I think it'd need to be "HomoPerfectus". Unless you're just a homo with bad English syntax.
__________________

SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
Reply With Quote
  #13  
homoperfect homoperfect is offline
Member
homoperfect's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
homoperfect is probably a spambot
Old Feb 27th, 2006, 08:17 AM       
I was just trying to come up with a sn. I wasn't worried about the particulars.
__________________
"Cogito ergo sum"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
ItalianStereotype ItalianStereotype is offline
Legislacerator
ItalianStereotype's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: HELL, where all hot things are
ItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty okItalianStereotype is probably pretty ok
Old Feb 27th, 2006, 08:27 AM       
I would've probably gone for something else. people might read your name and think that you're gay or something. :<
__________________
I could just scream
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.