Features

mburbank · #1

WASHINGTON - Discharging troops under the
Pentagon's policy on gays cost $363.8 million over 10 years, almost double what the government concluded a year ago, a private report says.

Emu · #2

That's a small price to pay to keep them from dropping their guns and running like sissies and disturbing other, heterosexual soldiers with their come-ons. I mean, how the hell are you supposed to hold a gun if you're constantly worrying about your manicure? Jesus, fags.

mburbank · #3

You know you're right. Now that I think of it, really, it was fags cost us that money, not the policy. Fags and their fag lieing about their faggotry. I think acts of sodomy should be taxed until this debt is repaid.

ItalianStereotype · #4

source?

that seems way too steep.

Emu · #5

It's over the past 10 years. In that respect, it isn't really that much, compared to other expenses.

Cosmo Electrolux · #6

are they still afraid that, in the heat of battle, one of those fags will slip up behind one of our brave fighting men and slip a weenie up his pooper?

Kulturkampf · #7

No...

Are you in the Army? I am.

Do you know what would happen to gays in the Army?

The lawsuits for gays being beaten inside out would be enough to off-set that; 60 minutes would constantly be running reports about the latest homosexual beaten within inches of his life (or even to death) in this or that unit.

I am a liberal by military standards.

Gays in an Army unit? Sounds like a recipe for someone getting their head kicked in once a month.

Spectre X · #8

And whose fault would that be? The fault of the gays? For being gay? Or the fault of the people who actually can do something about it?

executioneer · #9

good thing the kind of people who would beat a gay guy up are in the army then, in other countries getting shot at

Sirhamalot · #10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kulturkampf

No...

Are you in the Army? I am.

Do you know what would happen to gays in the Army?

The lawsuits for gays being beaten inside out would be enough to off-set that; 60 minutes would constantly be running reports about the latest homosexual beaten within inches of his life (or even to death) in this or that unit.

I am a liberal by military standards.

Gays in an Army unit? Sounds like a recipe for someone getting their head kicked in once a month.

Why does it seem the various incarnations of the Army Times (Navy Times, Air Force Times, ect) are focused on this issue? Every place I have been in just abides by the don't ask don't tell and doesn't make an issue of it. As far as the cost, I wouldn't put to much thought into it. After all, costs are extremely exaggerated on any OTH or Dishonorable discharge that it seems a little mad to use those figures. Things they put into account are time left in the members contract, prosecution costs (if applicable), and administrative costs (which we would eat one way or another). Kulturkampf has a good point that some of the current members in the military would not be able to serve openly one way or another. Ignoring the problem, and questionable members seems to be the correct answer, of course they could go back to the old way (which lead to fewer discharges to boot).

Abcdxxxx · #11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kulturkampf

Do you know what would happen to gays in the Army?

I'll take a wild guess.... they have to endure your constant lewd come ons?

(sorry, you were asking for that one!)

I thought the Army was full of sensitivity training these days, though. How isn't it worse to have a bunch of mandatory closet cases running around?

mburbank · #12

KunningKrab, how does someone as dumb as you keep their autonomic nervous system up and running? Aren't you afriad one day you'll just not forget your heart needs to beat?

New dumb guy, here's something else they could do. Mandate that the army wouldn't tolerate discrimination on the basis of sexulity, and enforce it. But I guess tht's not realistic. That's why the army still isn't integrated.

Pharaoh · #13

Quote:

Originally Posted by mburbank

Aren't you afriad one day you'll just not forget your heart needs to beat?

What the hell does that load of crap mean, butwank?
Do you mean if someone remembers that their heart needs to beat then they'll die, or what? :/

mburbank · #14

The autonomic nervous system functions without concious control. It's run by the most primitive part of the brain. If you were so stupid that even your lizard brain couldn't keep you functional, you'd be, well... really stupid.

You know what I'm talking about.

and... BREATH!

Good boy.

Preechr · #15

Your insults are so far over his head he has to send his buddy in figure out what the insult meant before he can respond.

See, you should have made something up rather than explaining what you really meant.

...or maybe you did...

mburbank · #16

it's been that kind of day.

Pharaoh · #17

Quote:

Originally Posted by mburbank

The autonomic nervous system functions without concious control. It's run by the most primitive part of the brain. If you were so stupid that even your lizard brain couldn't keep you functional, you'd be, well... really stupid.

You know what I'm talking about.

and... BREATH!

Good boy.

Yes I know what you're talking about, wankbut, no thanks to your terrible grammar.

And surely you mean BREATHE! Not BREATH!

Kulturkampf · #18

Quote:

Originally Posted by mburbank

KunningKrab, how does someone as dumb as you keep their autonomic nervous system up and running? Aren't you afriad one day you'll just not forget your heart needs to beat?

New dumb guy, here's something else they could do. Mandate that the army wouldn't tolerate discrimination on the basis of sexulity, and enforce it. But I guess tht's not realistic. That's why the army still isn't integrated.

Mandate it? Then we'd lose thousands of soldiers a year due to sexual orientation based harassment and assaults. Good solution for destroying the debt problem we have....

If gays were in the military, we'd lose countless dollars to lawsuits and then countless more in losing thousands of other soldiers annually because of the crimes against gays.

You are a cunt.

Dole · #19

So...you didnt actually take in what he said then?

mburbank · #20

No, he did! He's cleverly referencing all the thousands of soldiers a year we've lost due to racial orientation based harassment and assaults since we started little pure white folk and darkies fight in the same units!

We've lost thousand of soldiers because of their crimes against blacks, and those are the soldiers we need most! The ones who don't care about following orders and would rather fight each other than any old enemy!

Cosmo Electrolux · #21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kulturkampf

Quote:

Originally Posted by mburbank

KunningKrab, how does someone as dumb as you keep their autonomic nervous system up and running? Aren't you afriad one day you'll just not forget your heart needs to beat?

New dumb guy, here's something else they could do. Mandate that the army wouldn't tolerate discrimination on the basis of sexulity, and enforce it. But I guess tht's not realistic. That's why the army still isn't integrated.

Mandate it? Then we'd lose thousands of soldiers a year due to sexual orientation based harassment and assaults. Good solution for destroying the debt problem we have....

If gays were in the military, we'd lose countless dollars to lawsuits and then countless more in losing thousands of other soldiers annually because of the crimes against gays.

You are a cunt.

Spoken like a true retard...literally....all that's missing is the drool...