Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > General Blabber
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 06:26 AM        typed in www.i-mock on accident and got:
http://www.scary-crayon.com/blog/05-...commenting-on/

Quote:
So in response to agustinaldo's suggestion, I think reviewing other EN sites in depth would be pretty pointless. They've all got articles I like and articles I don't -- and though some have more hits than misses, it's really as simple as that. I also largely dislike most of the larger sites these days because of what they've become. I can't even view X-E on my desktop without the numerous Flash ads slowing it to a crawl and the last time I visited I-Mock it was a mess of popups and stupid "wait 30 seconds" pages featuring javascript balloons telling me I was the 8,283,712th visitor to the page or something and had won some random shit. I-Mock also seems more like a super vanity project to me than anything else these days. It's cool to see a photo of the article's author engaged in using the product during a given review (especially when the author is female and attractive or is wearing zombie makeup for no significant reason), but when you've got 2+ MB animated gifs with Photoshopped effects in almost every article, you're just being a vainglorious asshole. I remember one pic of RoG that was zoomed in so close you could see his fucking nose hairs. I've got no problems with Seanbaby's page, but does he even update anymore?
I guess the above counts as a mini review of those sites, though. It largely focuses on the negative, so I'll also reiterate that I do like a lot of the articles. It's no secret that I love the TMNT, and Matt's articles about them always help to remind me why. (Not that I've forgotten, but yeah.) I've found many of the film reviews on X-E and I-Mock to be humorous enough to warrant my tracking down the movies to add to my own collection -- for example, Nukie and the Jack Frost flicks and the godawful live action TMNT Christmas special. I once considered myself a big fan of those sites, so much so that they were a large part of my "inspiration" to start Scary-Crayon. Even that, however, was partly negative; it was less a "wow these guys are so cool I want to be just like them!" than a "hey, I write this kind of stuff in my blog all the time so why don't I write a few articles in this vein too" kind of deal. And then I tried sending the articles to these guys in an effort to get them printed on their sites -- Something Awful and I-Mock were accepting submissions at the time -- but nobody ever gave me a response. In fact, the only webmaster who responded to me then was Per Arne of Encyclopedia Obscura, who was kind enough to even preview SC articles and give me feedback and advice when I was getting the site together. Hope he's doing okay.
So I guess SC exists partly because the big site webmasters didn't think I was worth the several minutes or less it would take to write back and say something encouraging before shooting me down. (Though I recognize it's also possible that the e-mails slipped their minds or that the sends didn't go through. That happens sometimes.) I guess the site might eventually have come to pass anyway, but I probably would've spent more time trying to tailor my writing for other sites than trying to strike out on my own. I'd also probably have a little more love for those webmasters, but eh -- if they cared what I thought, they'd swing by once in a while and comment or maybe even link the site. Odds are they've never even heard of SC. Well, except Matt, because I quietly plugged it on his comments board like several weeks after it opened (in one of those tangential remarks, so it wasn't totally rude, but then more people started commenting on it there and well...) and he banned me for it.
Btw, since I called those other webmasters for not writing to me, it's only fair that I note that I too have neglected to respond to a lot of the folks who've written to me (which is largely inexcusable in my case because exceedingly few people do), but I do read and appreciate all of the SC fan mail I get. So if any of those people happen to be reading, thank you and I'm very, very sorry for forgetting to write back. I heart you all. Except the people who call me a fag and go on about how much Raven "rulz" in horrific caps-deprived e-mails. Please fix your shift keys and take the time to write "you" all the way out, mmkay?
Finally, some may be quick to call me a hypocrite for criticizing the other EN sites for their numerous ads when I have Google and SC store ads on SC, so let me respond to that. I also don't think the SC store ads are very intrusive, and while only two folks besides myself have ever bought shirts, I do like the shirts and think they'd be pretty cool items for SC fans to own (even if they are kind of costly, grr Cafepress grr). I plan to make more shirt designs in the near future that won't feature the word "cock" and could therefore be worn in unfamiliar company without necessarily offending the sensibilities of strangers. Regarding the Google ads, they're 1) waaay at the bottom of the articles and 2) not Flash ads, so I don't think that they're having all that much of an impact on the presentation. Believe me, if they were, they'd be gone -- I'd rather close the site down than be forced to have stupid flash ads featuring idiotic "shoot the rabid monkey" games and new movie releases on every page and shit. But even so, I really hate the Google ads and fully intend to do away with them at some point. Admittedly that's partly because they're worthless: Google only pays every $100 and they've only racked in about $35 so far -- this is since November, btw -- so to get rid of them now would essentially be giving Google $35 worth of free advertising. On the other hand, it's likely that we'll never get to $100, so not getting rid of them immediately is still like giving them more free advertising. It's a difficult decision and I'm really not sure what to do, but the $35 or however much would sure help to pay the SC rent if I could ever fucking get it. Also, the ads often have almost nothing to do with the articles, which is pretty stupid.
Anyway, that's all for now. Thanks for reading and ja ne, minna-san.
i thought that was kind of funny for some reason ;o
__________________
NEVER

Last edited by kahljorn : Aug 3rd, 2007 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Guitar Woman Guitar Woman is offline
Drugs+drugs+rock+roll
Guitar Woman's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Guitar Woman is probably a real personGuitar Woman is probably a real person
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 08:20 AM       
you mind using NSFW or something

Last edited by Guitar Woman : Aug 3rd, 2007 at 09:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 05:54 PM       
obviously that wasn't in the original thing i read ;o i don't even remember there having been a picture ;/
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Mockery Mockery is offline
Pickled Patriarch
Mockery's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Mockery is probably a real personMockery is probably a real person
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 07:04 PM       
Taken from http://www.i-mockery.com/info.php

Quote:
Question: Can I write for I-Mockery?

Answer: We used to be more open about accepting submissions, but generally nowadays, we stick with the people that we already have on staff (ie: Dr. Boogie, Protoclown, Max Burbank, etc). While none of them are full-time staffers, though Dr. Boogie is close considering how much he helps out around here, when they do send in new material it's always a classic read. I also just don't have the time to read the HILARIOUS articles that every 12-year-old decides to send in to me. Still, you're welcome to submit material if you want. Just don't expect myself or the others to find the time to read it for about a year or so.
That notice has been up on the site for years for this exact reason. I get a TON of emails and it's simply impossible for me to get to all of them, let alone read people's submissions. I used to be able to respond to every single person that emailed me, but that was a long time ago. But in case there's any confusion: we've got a great compact team here on I-Mockery and I want to keep it that way... not looking for new writers. I'm glad if I helped this guy start his own site in some way; I'd rather see more people doing their own thing instead of having to cater to our style (which is apparently to "vain" for this guy). I've actually been to Scary-Crayon before (probably because Pjalne mentioned it to me or I received some other email from them) and honestly thought it was set up better than the average e/n site that people send me links to that they set up on their geocities homepage or what have you. It's too bad he comes off sounding like a pissed off kid who wishes somebody knew his site existed in that post.

The simple fact, however, is that I-Mockery is one of the oldest humor sites on the web, and since we have an established following, there's going to be plenty of criticism to go along with it (just like all the other e/n sites get). All we're here to do is make people laugh, and if they don't like what we're doing or how we're presenting it, there's a ton of other sites out there to explore. We're having fun here and don't plan on changing anything other than adding more 'n more new features to the site. I think we're extremely lucky to be where we are... and it's pretty spiffy that so many people have stuck with us over the years.

Actually, all of this has been a lie. I only work with pretty people. Sure, it's shallow, but I'll be damned if guys like Max, Boogie and Protoclown aren't sexy as hell.

__________________
Talent, vigor, drive...
You'll eat peanut butter the rest of your life.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
tenno tenno is offline
Member
tenno's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: vegas
tenno is probably a spambot
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 07:37 PM       
Psssssh. We had the Kap'n.

Fuck everyone else.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Aug 3rd, 2007, 10:07 PM       
Yea i can imagine you might get a lot of submissions ;o
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Sacks Sacks is offline
The Wrong Melon Farmer
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: (つ♥ヮ♥)つ ٩๏̯͡๏)۶
Sacks is probably pretty okSacks is probably pretty okSacks is probably pretty ok
Old Aug 4th, 2007, 02:46 AM       
What does EN stand for? Entertainment/Nostalgia?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
AChimp AChimp is offline
Resident Chimp
AChimp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Jungles of Borneo
AChimp is probably a real personAChimp is probably a real person
Old Aug 4th, 2007, 09:56 PM       
Entertainment/News
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Sacks Sacks is offline
The Wrong Melon Farmer
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: (つ♥ヮ♥)つ ٩๏̯͡๏)۶
Sacks is probably pretty okSacks is probably pretty okSacks is probably pretty ok
Old Aug 4th, 2007, 11:20 PM       
I don't think I'd be going to any of those sites for news.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Mockery Mockery is offline
Pickled Patriarch
Mockery's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Mockery is probably a real personMockery is probably a real person
Old Aug 4th, 2007, 11:31 PM       
It's also known as "Everything/Nothing" - as in the subject matter of the articles are about random things that mean everything to the authors, but mean nothing to most other people out there.

A lot of sites get lumped into the e/n category... I just call us a humor/entertainment site. So I guess that would be h/e then? o.O
__________________
Talent, vigor, drive...
You'll eat peanut butter the rest of your life.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Seven Force Seven Force is offline
Let's play Hardball!
Seven Force's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Under my desk, MSNBC
Seven Force is probably a spambot
Old Aug 5th, 2007, 03:13 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mockery View Post
Actually, all of this has been a lie. I only work with pretty people. Sure, it's shallow, but I'll be damned if guys like Max, Boogie and Protoclown aren't sexy as hell.

Translation: No minorites
__________________
Ha!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Dr. V Dr. V is offline
Charming
Dr. V's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: That once place, you know. Around the corner.
Dr. V is probably a spambot
Old Aug 5th, 2007, 06:22 AM       
what a fuckin whiner
__________________
I'm sorry, I just... I don't feel sorry for you?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.