Day of Media Observence

[kahljorn]

Day of media observances:
gabby cacaface how did you do it?

well i was talking to my severely mongoloid retarded best friend rite and i was like hey how u doin mongo want anything?

and he was all, "grbldegak gak yittle"

and i was all whoa mongo calm down i was just asking if you wanted me to get you anyuthing!

YURTLE PLAT COF

oh you just want some coffee!

and then it struck me sometimes people have misunderstandings and they repeat themselves to get the point across!
This was really a breakthrough for me because I always thought when people repeated themselves they were giving me coded directions to the holy grail.
Hopefully i can share this with everyone and then we'll all realize the Holy Grail is within us waiting to be filled with the salty liquid of answered questions and true understanding!

[Grislygus]

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

I noticed a pattern of argument that's consistant - with both internet and non internet subjects.
The internet subject is interesting. Say, for example, that I take two people of equal intelligence, one on the machine and one in-person. The internet subject does better because they're presented with an opportunity to structure their arguments, and disect the entire idea.

First, let me remind you that internet debates involve writing.

Then let me present to you the philosophical seminars of ancient Greece and the point-counterpoint literary pamphlets from the Restoration Period (or hell, any piece written before the internet). Both styles of argument fully allow structuring of arguments and the ability to dissect the entire idea, while Athenian person-on-person stylings actually having a larger emphasis on it.

Basically, you fail at the internet.

you can find my next book, which will contain parts of this transcript, in August 2007 at Borders bookstores and other propriators of liturature. The title is Vintage Ideals and Lost Systems.

stay tuned.
more to come.

Despite the 100% chance that you're bullshitting, I'm actually hoping that I see your book someday.

[kahljorn]

I also want to see myself glorified for kicking her ass in an argument.

I GUESS LENOR IS RIGHT I COULD BE FAMOUS
SORRY LENOR
I WASNT THINKING OF THE HIGH LIFE I COULD BE LIVIN

[Dr. Boogie]

So what are the names of your books that have already been published, Gabby?

[Gabby GaGa]

ever heard of J.T leroy?
-----------
My god. You people really are stupid.
I thought you were faking it.

The point of the book isn't the argument itself.
it's the reaction.

When I say a "pattern", I speak of pattern similarities between structured and non-structured argument subjects.

Yes, all that is true about ancient greece.
However, we're living in a time that breeds a blatent disregard for intellect, much less the structure behind it.

I should title a chapter "the nature of reaction".

I don't need to prove my intellect to you pee-ons.
(certain people I like excluded).

Watch the movie
or read the book.

[Gabby GaGa]

kshl,
nothing gets through to you, does it?

You didn't kick my ass.
you kicked my case-studies ass.

[Grislygus]

Lollercaust. So, what ARE the names of those books you wrote?

[Gabby GaGa]

please google JT leroy

[Gabby GaGa]

Lollercaust

i like that word
gonna have to steal it.

[Grislygus]

Thank Encyclopedia Dramatica.


Also, if you're inferring that you're J.T. Leroy, then... well, I can't really say anything, you're hysterical enough already.

[kahljorn]

"However, we're living in a time that breeds a blatent disregard for intellect, much less the structure behind it."

Yea because other time periods have been much more concerned with intellect and the structure behind it.

"You didn't kick my ass" something about case studies

first off you don't have a case study. Secondly, you were the one talking out of your ass about hinduism and other religions. It didn't have anything to do with a case study, it just has to do with you talking out of your ass. So as far as the ass talking out of goes, I've already proven that you did it. Then I kicked you in the mouth, bleeding assgina.
I think we all know you were serious about your, "I know a lot because I've been to india" you just had to change the subject because i had so thoroughly nailed you in t he mouthfaceass when i said that you're the one who doesn't understand ancient hinduism (when you had been saying that to me the entire time) ;9
KICKED IN THE MOUTH
END OF STORY

WRITE A BOOK ABOUT BEING KICKED IN THE MOUTH

[kahljorn]

so who's this jt leroy person and is she that person?
prolly not

i think we all know she hasn't written a book (that's good). She might've written some shit but anybody can write shit.

[Misdemonar]

hahah, gabby shitface, you are self-asorbed!

[mew barios]

man i can't wait til gabby is like, haha i fooled all of you lol it took me like 6 months to make up this ugly website and stupid poetry an devise a foolproof posting stratagem but it was all worth it to see the looks on your faces!

seriously though, if people really do buy books that are just logs of intarnet message boards i think someone should put together an i-mockery greatest hits so i can relive all the classic thread moments on long boatrides an stuff.

[Gabby GaGa]

I have a friend who's already putting together a messageboard book.
but im sure they could always use some (profitable) help.

Kahl -

religion was one of many subjects i picked

these are 3 of 20 catagories and sub-catagories I chose


Religon
- history belief, practices
American history -
kenndy isn't dead
Quail is president
biology -
metabolism, growth, life cycle.

These are all argument presented to subjects for them to "disprove"

this is also a helful study because it provides an outline for illogical rationalization, and methods that subjects use to cope.

My favorite was a study I did for the pop culture reference crowd,

In which the argument was that Elvis wasn't dead, and some current idols are robots.

Of course, any common ninny can figure out this isn't true.
However, when a linguist debates the argument with the test subject,
(which i either myself or a selection of Drs.)
we try to use one of two methods, which will extract an the desiered or unknown patterns.
The "elvis and kennedy aren't dead" scenerios are the easiest to debate, because of the copious amounts of contradictions available for refference.
That study is the one in which an illogical argument will unvariably "win"
so the person gives their efforted but failing answer.

The second study is the one in which the subject should always win the argument, because of the sheer stupidy of the it. This path is intersting too, because the even though the argument presented is nonsensical and easily argued, subjects often percieve a threat to their own personality, and their conscience automatically uses one of four teqniques to cope.

and what was your latest project, Kahl?

[kahljorn]

kicking you in the mouth

ps you're not that jt leroy person because you said you've only published two books and that person has supposedly published more than that. even if there are some similarities

MYSTERY SOLvED

dont feel so bad just because i outargued you.

[kahljorn]

also it's nice that you have a little project to work on my sister likes to do scrap booking maybe you sh ould try that they sell scrapbook materials at dollar stores

[Grislygus]

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

and what was your latest project, Kahl?

It's the professional touch that I like.

[Gabby GaGa]

now Im not even here to be professional
I just like torturing kahl
its fun to watch him keep arguing, long after the fact.

kinda like a women
when you set a wet cup on the table.

also it's nice that you have a little project to work on my sister likes to do scrap booking maybe you sh ould try that they sell scrapbook materials at dollar stores

Damn that was weak.
I expected more from you.
"you look like an egyptian hooker"
would have been good.

[Grislygus]

If you're so intent on mocking, then how come you still haven't taken me up on that grudge match?

[Jeanette X]

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

Damn that was weak.
I expected more from you.
"you look like an egyptian hooker"
would have been good.

Your avatar is an actual picture of you?

[Emu]

If that's true, then the camera subtracts 50 pounds.

It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy when the entire board can gang up on one person like this. Group hug! ♥

[Goat Cheese]

Hey Emu do you have a liscence to use that heart character?

[Fathom Zero]

Hey guys, can I be a faux intellectualist, too?

[Gabby GaGa]

I didn't know there was a grudge match, my ancient mariner.
Where it at?

Your avatar is an actual picture of you?

yeah.

I see a mock coming up.