Quote:
Originally Posted by pinky lee
Hello, SFB, anyone in there? Its a forum. Its a topic in the forum. Its on the internet. Every post in here is someone's worthless opinion. Of course, your's was more worthless than most since it didn't have shit to do with the topic.
|
It had everything to do with the topic, because when someone makes a ridiculous argument that they don't substantiate, then it's completely in-line with the topic to call you out on it.
Quote:
Of course what can I expect from someone who immediately jumps on the dork train by using t33kid as his avatar, just like 20,000 other dorks I've seen in other forums today and yesterday.
|
Yeah, unlike the very original user pic of yourself or maybe your mall punk girlfriend looking all introspective and deep for the digital camera.
Quote:
Is everyone in this forum a moron or just the ones who've been responding to my posts?
|
I dunno, keep making interesting and thought provoking interjections such as "it no matter, republicans so better."
Quote:
Yeah, God forfend anyone rain on your little puff party by suggesting that your hand-picked choices might have Gary Coleman's chance at actually getting elected. Let's not dilly dally with any tangential issues like electability, let's just stick with a meaningless exercise in clicking radio buttons. We wouldn't want intelligent political discourse to break out.
|
It's very early in the game to insinuate who will or could win. All you can do is monitor polling data, see how certain candidates are doing compared to others in fundraising, look at
who is giving them their support, etc.
So, if you want to make a serious contribution to this thread, why not define what it is you consider electability? Is it merely some partisan nonsense, or do you really have some objective analysis on what it takes to win the popular vote in 2004....?
Quote:
And by the way, why are Richard Gephardt, Carol Moseley-Braun and Bob Graham, not to mention Wesley Clarke left off that poll? You have some kind of unreasoning prejudice against the front runner in Iowa, the only woman running and the senior senator from Florida?
|
Yeah, Check the date on the poll genius. Clarke announced he MIGHT run YESTERDAY, And by that point the other three were shakey on announcing their candidacies, if I recall correctly.
Nobody has contributed to the poll in days anyway, and if you read through the thread, I haven't discriminated against any of the candidates (providing they were actually making any headlines that day or week).