|
|

Sep 11th, 2003, 02:47 AM
I think it's a pretty empty article, honestly. The author prematurely labels these as myths, without doing much to disprove any of them besides pointing out all the loose threads.
Of #5, his only explanation is that there has yet to be a conclusive verdict that the stocks manipulation "might well have" occured.
He also says...
some operative may have inquired about crop dusting.
Moussaouis was prepared to fly some sort of plane.
Iraq should be suspect, and a connection is "entirely possible" .
Our knowledge of the final moments on those flights is incomplete and misleading, and since we don't know what happend the box cutter knives theory isn't "demonstrably false".
So what is this saying? Not much.
|
|
|
|