Rebirth? Reincarnation?

[kahljorn]

Classical debate between Classical buddhists who are so classy their class outclasses the class of the classy sirs with kaviar. I would tend to say rebirth, because most Buddhist "Philosophies" would tend to agree upon my tending. However, this tension is often resolved upon reading a certain parcel, call this parcel Golden Eggshell #1.
You see, it essentially says Sir Criesalot(Adavenianda or something) shall be reborn as a buddhist in another life. Why? I don't know. What crazy crazyness thought by the crazy regressed hypno potimus.
As for the rest, it seems to be outlined in general science, toaism and "Christianity". Rebirth is just the idea that things must die and go the fuck away for another to come and say, "Hi my name is joe". This would tend to outline my general marmaliads, small compilations of many, as though the galaxy were reborn all into the earths Cellular fibrosis, oft described as humanity, though considered by me to be nothing more than a cancer. A necessary cancer, for progressional regression marks energies wigity wam, sam.
So basically, does the individual soul and all it's "Karma" carry on to the next life? Or when we die, is it over, and our pieces are left behind to haunt the flow with such a devious passion those echoing our "Legacy" would be declared individual and loved, while merely passing on our conceptual embers. Is that form of rebirth the true form of Reincarnation, merely our conceptual path carved slowly through stony brains leeking their unsaturated energies of our words?
There is also a scripture about rebirth, stating life and death is like taking a lit candle, and lighting another candle. Even as the earlier lit candles burn out, new candles are being lit, and some are still burning. That is a conjecture on beheart of a half, could it be the flame. The flame, the flickering martyr of the flame?