Okay, I've changed my mind, I'm not done with this thread. No, you didn't hurt my feelings, you have to be mean something to them first. This is an intellectual debate, and this message board is just a diversion for me (as I hope it is for most everyone). I get very little out of it, and I put in more than I should. I post about Christianity on here because there are so many threads about it and because I know more about it than Islam or Hinduism or what-have-you. I'd be tickled pink if there was a thread for me to discuss the finer points of Satanism, but it seems pretty obvious to me that even if people here knew what they were talking about with that, I would be on my own against the world.
As for what irritated me originally, once I found out you were talking to me not Brandon, your "vague assertions" included, among countless other:
Quote:
your "Hate" is misdirected
|
By which you implied that I hated something.
Quote:
the fact that you can base most of your "intelligence" off the fact that you can derail christianity "Really well" would tend to include the fact that you are active participants in their religion
|
By which you mocked my intelligence and implied that "derailing Christianity" was important to me.
Quote:
your denial of Christianity as per philisophical complications would tend to signify your democratic taste for it as you take a step or two
|
By which you assumed that I deny Christianity rather than ignoring it in favor of a better philosophy and yet there was still something that drew me to it.
Quote:
your wonderful christian avatar
|
By which you didn't make any sense at all, but at least established that you were addressing me. I may be splitting hairs, but when I see a whole post full of the word "you" that ends in a sentence that obviously refers to a particular person, I tend assume the other "you"s are directed at the same.