Killing endangered species will save them.

[The One and Only...]

First, the greater the diversity the more stable the ecosystem. That's not theoretical.

Your point being what? All we really need are domesticated animals and green plants.

Course, the rate in the amount of vermin, insects, etc. would rise, but then again technology is already coming up with ways to get rid of them. Plus, I don't think you will see many more snakes, etc. or even game animals killed than before.

Second, if you can't see the aesthetic, historical, moral importance of tigers, asian elephants, bald eagles, wolves, friggin snail darters, then God or nature left a piece out of your heart, brain or soul.

Probably, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.

Third, you're only being stupid to provoke me.

If that is true, then it worked.

Fourth, in what way would your stance argue against people hunting each other for sport or profit?

If you consider humans and animals to have the same level of importance, then you are mistaken.

I would not complain if those being shot were willing, but to do otherwise would not only be immoral but not very practical. If the world were full of murderers and vigilantes, we would live in chaos. The government would most certainly be overthrown. Private property rights would not be protected. The only benefit I see is a reduction in population.

fifth, I'm sorry, I just can't give any credence to you actually being this stupid as opposed to layering on idiocies that at this moment in your life you think of as in some way lgiving you the personlity most people your age aquire getting a tattoo or a really keen jacket.

I'm not sure I followed that, but I'm guessing what you said was that I only think this way because of my youth?