Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Dec 4th, 2003, 10:30 AM       
I agree wholeheartedly with that last statement. When we as a society start viewing minorities, the poor, the homeless and women as individuals, get back to me.

The idea that AA is quotas is in most cases ridiculous and where applicable, a missreading of what it's for. Racial preference should be for equally qualified candidates.

"Futhermore, you do realize that rascism in the workplace and education is barely existant? "
That is such a huge load of steaming crap I can only assume it's some of your pillow talk with the Cato institute.

"Even more so, if you support AA on the basis inequal education, why don't you support more fair education and/or affirmative action for poverty level rather than race? "
I do. The Government does not, and associates such attempts with 'class warfare'.

"advancement of minorities is a necessity". Not 'advancement'. Fairness and redress. But you think racism, gender preference, etc. is a thing of te past so its hard to talk about a level playing field.

Don't you think we already have unoficial 'affirmative' action for rich white connected males? Or are you, like Vinth, going to Argue that folks like W. get into Harvard and Yale on the strength of their transcripts?
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.