Determinism Revisited

[mburbank]

You know what, OAO? You don't get what I'm saying, you don't even accept the possability that somebody might know more about something than you do and you start your arguments with the ironclad assumption you are already right. There is no uncertainty that argument with you is pointless.

Two things for you to go back and concider.

I already know that faster than light speed is impossible and I already know why. If that was my point, what was I saying to you? To be more direct, anyone can win any argument if hidden variable X= that thing which will make me win the argument.


Disproving 2+2=5 is not proving a negative, it is disproving a statement. Don't you have teachers? Or have the found your prancing so deterimental to the other students they have asked you to remain silent?