|
|

Jan 25th, 2004, 04:27 AM
The key words to your post are "so far".
Despite the lack of paper work to coroborate it, common sense should tell us it was likely that an Iraq who harbored and supported other terrorists would also be open to Al Qaeda, and that any activity within their borders would have been under the participation of the strict dictatorship in place at the time. We know Bin Laden would work with heathens like the United States, surely an actual Muslim, even a weak minded infidel one would make a perfect candidate for a false partnership. After all Iraq wasn't just another hot bed for terrorist hideouts, it was the only true safe haven they had.
Again, what conclusively proves Iraq's innocence so far?
|
|
|
|