|
|
|
Member
|
| |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
|
|
Jan 25th, 2004, 02:03 PM
I don't understand the legal process
Perhaps I missed something. Since when is the burden of proof on the accussed? How do you propose that Iraq, in any way shape or form proof that they didn't harbor terrorists?
I have never smoked a cigarette in my life. Ever. How do you suppose I could go about proving that?
It would also seem "rational" to assume that Iraq had vital, working WMD programs and not one single shred of worthwhile evidence has been found to support it. Why should the terrorism link be any different.
| |
| |
|
|
Threaded Mode
