|
Mocker
|
 |
|
|

Feb 5th, 2004, 06:58 PM
Yeah, OAO's argument isn't a very strong one. Who is to say that the natural world (presumably, the universe) necessarily had to be caused? One could imagine the Big Bang being an uncaused event; to my layman's knowledge, this idea hasn't been rejected. Of course, if the universe is uncaused, then the first premise is also untrue.
|
|
|
|