|
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
|
 |
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
|
|

Mar 11th, 2004, 11:58 AM
Thanks for the link. I think his drug abuse addled his brain permanently. He offers no evidence of his theory beyond his reasonable hypothesis that the ame words mean some sort of cooperation as opposed to spontanaety. He again states That Heinz gave money to organizations some of these people belonged to. So have I. Did I pay them to say what they said? Does he have some evidence of colusion between Kerry and these people? If he does, he has a responsability to come forward with it. He, like you, confuses the words opinion and fact.
It is my opinion that W. deliberately used information he knew to be a forgery in his state of the union adress. I believe I have good reason to think so. Is it an established fact? No. The evidence is circumstantial. Limbaughs evidence is a lot more circumstantial.
Show me the talking points. Show me the payment. This is a conspiracy theory. Might it be true? Sure. But right now you have zero past a perfectly legal danation and the same words used by more than one person. I think the families in these organizations agreed on wording together. As a republlican you surely know the benefits of 'staying on message' when you want to make a point. You cat as if you have a signed contrct between Theresa Heinz and speciffic people paying them to read a script. I believe you think that's what hapened.
|
|
|
|