|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
|
|

Jun 27th, 2004, 10:58 PM
Why not...
I wont get into all of that because it becomes a long winded argument which Im too lazy to engage in on a Sunday night.
But does not that then rationalize the argument to detain prisoners at Gitmo? There very well may be no charges against them either, and perhaps they are guilty of nothing more than association as well, but by that logic it seems to me to justify detention of them as well. In fact, the folks at Gitmo are probably MORE connected to terrorist attacks and Al Qaeda than bin Laden's family.
I agree they should have had to wait just like everyone else. But that's not the heart of the argument. And again, it alludes to a veiled reference that Bush was somehow complicit in the 9/11 attacks.
|
|
|
|