With talk like this, what do YOU think Bush should do?

[mburbank]

Tell the South Koreans that. And you mean you think they cannot be allowed to develope MORE Nuclear weapons, since they've already been 'allowed' to develop some. Since they have them, you can call it 'nuclear blackmail' or 'aid' like we'd have given Turkey if they bent over for us, but we have to deal. Not Dictate. It shouldn't be so distatsteful. After all 'nuclear blackmail' is pretty much what we hold over the heads of everyone else on earth.

Your position, much like our current international policy is that the US will decide who is 'alllowed' to do what and back it up with the Army. If the UN cares to rubber stamp those aims, swell. If that stamp isn't inked and poised then they're irrelavant and we'll decide on who's 'allowed' what and what the punishment for noncompliance is. Now, you might not think of that as Globa lHegemony, but oddly a lot of the rest of the world does.

I'm all in favor of real diplomacy. So far, our Adminstration has said we'll talk but not negotiate (which seems kind of pointless) We will talk, but only oif other folks are there and Don't worry we promise moving Bombers capable of delivering Nuclear weapons to Guam is just a proactive measure and we really would never strike first, even though we're about to in Iraq, and by the way, we can't really sit down at the tbale now becuase were too busy preparing to invaded Iraq, but don't let that make you nervous. Oh, and also? If we DO go ahead and bomb your nuclear facilities, please don't take that as a sign that we're going to subject you to forcible "Regime Change" and figure you've got nothing to loose and Nuke South Korea or Japan, 'cause we just want to disable your nuclear program and we'd never invade the way we're about to in Iraq. Seriously. Don't get all nutty.