|
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
|
 |
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
|
|

Aug 12th, 2004, 01:54 PM
Common fucking sense, I'd say. If you want to pull energy/matter out of oblivion, you'd better have a damn good explanation for from whence it came or from what process it came about.
It does get a little more sticky at the quantum level, but when you take the averages over all the processes of quantum foam you always end up with just as much energy at the end as at the beginning of the observation.
And Zhukov, considering all the minute details and magnificant predictions the big bang model has predicted to incredible detail, I find it's not worth my time to consider it anything less than the real deal. Specifically, what evidence is out there that contradicts the big bang, really?
|
__________________
SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
|
|
|