Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Aug 12th, 2004, 07:08 PM       
I prefer the idea that big bangs are merely some kind of toaist cycling of life. Also, I don't personally think the initial creation would've came from a big bang, and answering as to if there was even an initial big bing bang would be pointless... because you would still have to answer as how the original mass of big bangables got there in the first place.
The idea that the universe is just one big fuel canister, and that there is a limit to how much energy and mass it can hold is kind of funny.

Oh yea, and even if there was one big bang in the "very begining", that big bang would've been brought about by other big bangs. Like the whole "Eternity" thing. Some kind of systematic tying of end over end into an hourglass shape... like japanese kites.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.