It's been proven to be good conversation starter on biased boards, and I figure it's better to be picked on by you than it is to... umm... Not? I dunno. This is I-mockery, right? I came here expecting to be mocked. Wear yourself out. If all you've got is
"PTHPTHPPTH!"
to offer, though, don't expect a particularly developed response.
You could have attacked the guild idea (I didn't call it that originally, preferring instead to describe it rather than name it, but Gator wanted to call them "guilds") on a number of valid points, but you chose instead to nitpick my spelling and act confused over an arcane and thus generally undefined word... and you call that an argument?
Here:
An association of people with similar interests or pursuits. If you wish to use the "definition" you picked up playing D&D, you pick a word for it. Then engage the argument or STFU and leave me to wait on someone that can add something to the discussion.
How are our regulations enforced? Is it working? Are you happy with the system as it is? Give me some examples where government regulation of private enterprise has improved the economy and Joe-Six-Pack's position in it, and I'll tell you the historically obviated formula that firing government regulators produces jobs on the order of one to ten. Explain to me how 1,000,000 pages of federal criminal laws restricting your personal freedom to do stuff makes you safer and more productive.
You can get all red-faced and pretend I'm suggesting we pack it all up and live in anarchy if you want. You can also make the logical assumption that I'd like to see the situation improved and provide me with the benefit of your amazing AChimp brain to either explain to me how I'm wrong and the status quo is just fine and dandy or how my theory is flawed, so I might improve upon it.
Mock/challenge me as you wish. You're the one on stage here. I'm the n00b and you're the regular. Show me you're more than just a post count.
Hybrid Mode
