Sethomas -- Gematria

[kahljorn]

Actually I'm arguing with a group of Qabalists and seth at the same time, and none of them are smart enough to supply me with enough argument to denounce the other ;/
Stupid qabalists. One of them actually said to me, ITS A DIVINE BOOK AND THATS WHY ITS MATHEMATICAL, and now i hate them.

But yea ,anyway, ive been studying the qabalah lately and I'm trying to find out the validity of it, or as close to validity or disvalidity as i can. The closest i can find to validity is that ancient hebrew had the same gematric values for letters as before, like A is strong/leader and made with an ox. This is like modern hebrew.
The arguments I've seen against it are that it didn't appear until on a coin, in 2nd century bc. That's the biggest argument against it. Also that there are only 22 letters in hebrew until they started using square hebrew, which had final forms, that's there other big argument. But it's pointless, because you dont use final forms in gematria, or most people don't. I've never met anyone who does.