|
|
|
|
Sep 27th, 2004, 02:11 PM
Your thesis for the paper is muddled. Your argument suffers from not having cited any primary sources, and the sources you did use were not properly cited. Also, you began your conclusion with "as has been shown", which is something that should never be done.
Your overall argument is shaky at best. I would give you a D on this paper only because you met the minimum length requirement, even though you reached that point by filling your paper with bilge.
| |
| |
|
|
Threaded Mode
