Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Sep 28th, 2004, 01:43 PM       
Oh, I don't think Iran would change it's plans for Kerry, I just think he'd be way better positioned to deal with it.

In making a case he wouldn't be saddled with W's credability problems Vs. the rest of the world. Almost nobody wants a nuclear Iraq, but any leader that supported America would have to sell that idea to their constituency, many of whom are still sore at W. over the whole WMD, go it alone thing.

The only way to make Iran back down without the disaster of another invasion (which would basically convince most of the Muslim world that this was indeed a crusade) would be convincing pressure from an actual coalition, like the one W senior assembled. Jr. isn't interested in that sort of thing, has evidenced no talent for it beyond his lack of interest and is far less likely to be trusted in negotiation by potential allies, since on several critical issues he treated lap-dog Britain pretty poorly.

I think a Non Nuclear Iraq is in the worlds interest. But I think anoter middle eastern war would be beyond disasterous. I think Kerry would have a way better chance of achieving non nuclear Iraq and avoiding war than W, who I'm not even sure is intereted in avoiding another war.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.