|
Mocker
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Fuji
|
|

Nov 20th, 2004, 09:58 AM
A record is not as important as the sum of it's songs divided by their total number. That's just stupid. If there's a very uneven record where half a side is generic drivel and the other half is simply genious, some of the best music you've ever heard. Would you generate a score of an average of 5 due to your system? A record creates a certain resonance and that should be taken into account regardless of whether the songs themselves are involving or interesting. Consistency is one thing. Mood, texture, relevance are different. The scope in which you approach the music you review is limited.
|
__________________
|
|
|