Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Dec 17th, 2004, 04:30 PM       
I agree that most soldiers bristle at the mention of "urban warfare" as it is the most difficult to fight and our army is not really equipped to handle it for an extended period of time. It is simply not how army doctrine has structured to fight and to make it so would take a massive overhauling ... i.e. money. While it's true that the logistics of taking over a couple hundred thousand troops is a nightmare that takes time, I don't think that Rumsfeld had much support from the military brass in doing things on the cheap and in a hurry. I think that the military brass both knew what was needed and considered the threat low. It's all about Rumsfeld's "my way or the highway" intimidating style of leadership. His own advisors were afraid to speak against him. Maybe this is too much of a "conspiracy theory" type thing but doesn't it seem like the Iraqi military kind of laid down for this war in anticipation of an urban setting in which terrorist can thrive? They knew they couldn't beat us "head to head" but maybe ...
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.