Why I oppose the war, and why I protest

[theapportioner]

I haven't had such poor competition in a long time, and that is saying a lot. Ronnie Raygun looks like the next William F. Buckley compared to you.

For the amnesiacs, let me quote what you said a few posts earlier.

Iraq broke UN resolutions. SEVENTEEN of them. He had TWELVE years to disarm. We made a new resolution allowing force and military action to be taken if he did not disarm, Resolution 1441. He thumbed his nose at it. He hid weapons, hindered inspection processes, and broke the rules of the international law as set by the U.N. based on the cease fire agreement of Gulf War I.

This, you claim, is why we should go to war. Because Iraq violated seventeen United Nations resolutions. Implicit is your support of the UN as a world governing body, whose resolutions should be enforced. You endorse the UN.

Now, to the present:

The UN has become nothing but the first step into the One World Govt that the liberals cream their pants over.

Now you bash it? Can't have it both ways, mon ami. You are a confused child. I advise you to go back to your multiplication tables and Berenstein Bears reading assignment before engaging in political discourse.