Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Oct 14th, 2005, 10:56 AM       
I'll get it started.

Electoral "reform." A lot of people like to point out that the president's poll numbers are down to record lows. A lesser known stat. that they don't like to share is that poll numbers are down across the board. People are down on the parties, and they're simply down on politicians.

This was reflective in the 2002 races, you just didn't hear a lot about it, because President Bush sort of shielded the party from it due to his popularity at the time. But voters instead took it out on their states, with several governorships (sp?) changing over, as well as some state houses.

2006 may be the boiling point for this frustration, particularly in light of Iraq, Katrina, gas prices, etc.

So, i guess Mr. Preechr my question to you is do we take the Governator's lead? Do we look at non-partisan re-districting, and take the process out of the hands of the state-house parties that have essntially made an unspoken (and often spoken) agreement to solidify their turf and entrench themselves? Do we "throw the bums out," so to speak? Will it change a damn thing? Would alternative electoral policies, electoral reform (always a sticky subject), allow for innovative and new ideas/parties to emerge and take power, i.e. the LIBERTARIN PARTY!?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.