So, I was up late watching Nick News...

[kahljorn]

"I kinda figured that kal might read through some new stuff before he looked up the readily available criticisms of it. "

I didn't look up the criticisms of it, I figured that out on my own. The only criticism I read was the one Emu posted which was why I thought it was funny that it agreed with me.

It isn't exactly a stretch to figure out that things don't neccessarily magically become the way they are(unless you a creationist, which seems to be exactly what that guy is and all of his theories seem to revolve around it, even when it's about disproving evolution he seems to think they magically came into being the way they are), and the idea that smart people would get stuck on something so obvious as that is rather ridiculous.

"As I've said, the argument is very interesting."

It was interesting, and it made sense. It just doesn't work the way he says it does, and anybody who studies (or uses their brain)evolution at all would know that. Evolution isn't about one day poof, magically we're humans. It was a slow process of gradual changes that took a very long time. That's the PREMISE, and exactly what "Irreducible complexity" is attempting to refute, NOT that if you ripped out your heart you wouldn't be able to live anymore. Everybody knows that.
The fact that he completely ignored that shows exactly how stupid he was, and exactly how well he didn't understand evolution. He was basically putting his ideas of the universe onto evolution, which I personally find hilarious. He treated evolution like it was creationism. Projection?