I like how his entire side of the argument lead up to a theory that took about the time it did to type a reply out to find gigantic faults in. Why do people feel compelled to post evidence that don't prove anything, while excusing other evidences entirely without any real reasoning. See below for more details in a nearly chronological order involving his actual thought proccesses, reasonably based on his tangible actions.
"Well the other side of the argument says this, however it's not true. It's just not true. I can't tell you how many times I've had conversations about this and said it's not true... well, it's not so much that it's not true, I just want to challenge the scientific community so they'll be a little more responsible. I mean, right now they teach evolution in our
schools and it hasn't even been proven yet!!! I WONT BELIEVE TILL I METAMORPHHESISH. Well, anyway, after that finale I present another more
intellectual one, not only granting me the secret power of ethics but also making me better than you. What about this guy? He stumps alot of scientists.--- Hey wait, maybe I shouldn't insert this into a conversation that prior to this I demanded proofs that prove. I mean, should I really hold steadfast with my
values? Am I making a difference here? What am I doing??? I better start acting like an arrogant asshole so nobody realizes how stupid I am for even believing that shit would be relevant in any case, nonetheless by my own standards.'---preech on
And to imagine I gave him a conscience capable of realizing it's own actions. What a kind soul I am.
Threaded Mode
