Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Jan 4th, 2006, 08:18 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Blanco
Actually, when you look at most of the important advances in history (especially American history) scientific advances have been tied directly to military applications.

Space program: The German Vengance II rockets were the basis for shooting people into space.

Medicine: Gell pills were invented to get wounded soldiers to down their penicillin. The Civil War saw the greatest jumps in prosthetic technology until the use of robotics. The use of phosphorus and other incindiary chemicals during WWI led to the invention of skin grafts.

Internet: Product of DARPA, the R&D people for the Pentegon.
I'm not a huge fan of this argument. You often hear it made for why we should keep putting more and more money into NASA.

Okay, so after how many billions of dollars, we get how much innovation? Could we have simply directed those billions into the actual desired product itself (i.e. medicine, internet, blah blah)? I know, I know,perhaps innovation comes about from experiment and random chance, but it seems like a really roundabout way to improve on things.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.