|
|
|
Mocker
|
 |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
|
Jan 9th, 2006, 02:03 PM
Should you really use Wikipedia as an accurate source when mocking other peoples less accurate soruces? Aren't the entires in Wikipedia just submitted by normal people with no real check up on the facts? I didn't even read the quote from Wikipedia I just thinks its funny to cite them as a source when mocking other unreliable sources.
All these studies on homosexuals are a waste of time but it isn't really worth getting angry over.
Carnage has the best post in the thread. I love blaming the entire country of the United States on everything too
| |
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
| |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
