Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ziggytrix
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
I am great that you feel your personal experiences can stand in the way of actual, scientific polls (LOL).
My argument is moot when I post sources, and you post a personal anecdote?
|
Your sources were openly biased, and so are you. It amazes me that you expect to be taken seriously.
Do you think I'd be taken seriously if I were to post peace activist foundation funded study results in a thread about why the miltary is wrong?! |
They were openly anti-gay, of course, but they used previous studies in
their citations. They were clearly and factually cited from other studies, and documented. Hence the paranthesis and references to other studies throughout many of the reports.
Naturally, activist groups and foundations are the ones inclined to post these studies on the internet and publicize the information. Others aren't. They are scientists doing studies, and they publish them objectively, and then an activist site exploits the information.
That is the modus operandi.
Find me somethhing in the source that talks about how these studies were conducted by non-objective sources.
Threaded Mode
