Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Pharaoh Pharaoh is offline
Member
Pharaoh's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Pharaoh is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 11:38 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharaoh
Every religion disapproves of homosexuality, that's true.
Actually, it isn't. In many Native American tribes, homosexuals were revered and treasured as powerful shamans with a special connection to the spirit world that heterosexual people could not achieve. They used to be called berdache people, but that term has been replaced by "two-spirit."

Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia.org
These individuals are often viewed as having two spirits occupying one body. Their dress is usually a mixture of traditionally male and traditionally female articles. They have distinct gender and social roles in their tribes. For instance, among the Lakota there was one ceremony during the Sun Dance that was performed only by a two-spirited person of that tribe. (See winkte)

Two-spirited individuals perform specific social functions in their communities. In some tribes male-bodied two-spirits were active as healers or medicine persons, gravediggers, undertakers, handling and burying of the deceased, conducted mourning rites, conveyers of oral traditions and songs, nurses during war expeditions, foretold the future, conferred lucky names on children or adults, wove, made pottery, made beadwork and quillwork, arranged marriages, made feather regalia for dances, special skills in games of chance, led scalp-dances, and fulfilled special functions in connection with the setting up of the central post for the Sun Dance. In some tribes female-bodied two-spirits typically took on roles such as chief, council, trader, hunter, trapper, fisher, warfare, raider, guides, peace missions, vision quests, prophets, and medicine persons.

Some examples of two-spirited people in history include the accounts by Spanish conquistadors who spotted a two-spirited individual(s) in almost every village they entered in Central America.

There are descriptions of two-spirited individuals having strong mystical powers. In one account, raiding soldiers of a rival tribe begin to attack a group of foraging women when they perceive that one of the women, the one that does not run away, is a two-spirit. They halt their attack and retreat after the two-spirit counters them with a stick, determining that the two-spirit will have great power which they will not be able to overcome.
There's also Buddhism:

Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia.org
In Buddhism, the third of the Five Precepts states that one is to refrain from sexual misconduct. Among the many interpretations of what constitutes "sexual misconduct" are: sex outside of marriage (a relatively modern idea), sex with another person without the consent of your life partner, or the historically prevalent view that it was limited to describe rape, incest, and bestiality.

No Buddhist school prior to the European Imperialism that began largely around the 17th Century had ever described homosexuality as "sexual misconduct". Traditionally, however, monks are expected to be celibate and restrain themselves from all sexual activity.

Buddhist schools condemning homosexuality for laypersons is a recent development and there is no scriptural basis upon which it is to be condemned. The closest would be a few Buddhists who equated homosexuality to disability or being a transvestite, but there was no condemnation in any sense (see also [1]). Buddhist leaders throughout Asia accepted or even sanctified homosexuality.
Hinduism, being the diverse religion that it is, has sects which approve and those which disapprove:

Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia.org
Hindu views of homosexuality are varying and diverse. This is because the accepted Hindu religious texts do not explicitly mention homosexuality at all. Currently, the debate on homosexuality within Hinduism is controversial, especially amongst Hindus in countries where homosexuality is viewed by many others as acceptable. Furthermore the issue is complicated by the fact that in Hinduism many of the divinities are androgynous and some change gender to participate in homoerotic behaviour. To this day in modern India there are Hijras, transgendered men who have sex with men. They religiously identify as a separate third sex, with many undergoing ritual castration. However these beliefs about Hijras (Khoosras) are merely South Asian cultural beliefs, rather than Hindu religious beliefs. There is great debate over whether homosexuality is permitted in the Hindu religion.
Daoism:

Quote:
Originally Posted by wikipedia.org
This has been the traditional view of homosexuality in Taoism, that homosexual acts in it self are not wrong but all men are still required to reproduce. For example, Taoists may have homosexual relations as long as they continue the family tree by having a child with at least one woman. Many modern Taoists who also combine Confucianism have dropped their requirement of heterosexual relations due to medicinal advancements that allow reproduction without such sex, using IVF and/or surrogacy.
Do some fucking research before you open your mouth, please.

How long will it be before he dismisses everything I say for using Wikipedia as a source? Taking bets now, people.
Well so what? Christianity is split on homosexuality too, as I've already said. So you've proved nothing. None of the major religions approve of homosexuality, and they don't promote it like they do with hetrosexuality.

Anyway, I was actually replying to one of your leftist buddies, ScruU2wice, who stated, 'every religion hates gay people...'.
So why didn't you address your reply to him?
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:18 PM       
Because he was being facetious, you brick of a man. And I've proved plenty. You said every religion disapproves of homosexuality. That's just plain wrong; it's the people within the religion that disapprove, not the religion itself. I'm referring to the religions whose scripture do not even mention homosexuality; it's people bringing in their own distastes and injecting them into their religion as if the religion preaches it, as opposed to a religion like Christianity or Judaism, which explicitly states that homosexuality is a sin in its scripture.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:22 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Who's censoring him? They're investigating him because he used his free speech to spew hate speech that borders on speaking his intention to take violent action agaainst homosexuals.
LOL, what violent intentions towards homosexuals?

Liberals just fabricate bullshit -- "he disagrees with me. I think he's going to get violent so let's use that as our reason to censorship and thought-police."
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:24 PM       
Typically, when people say things like "x is damaging to society, it spreads disease, etc." that implies that it should be gotten rid of. I didn't say he was going to take violent action toward homosexuals, but what he said sure makes it seem like he would if given the chance.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Sethomas Sethomas is offline
Antagonistic Tyrannosaur
Sethomas's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Abstruse Caboose
Sethomas is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:24 PM       
I love conservatives who inadvertently quote a socialist's ideas.
__________________

SETH ME IMPRIMI FECIT
Reply With Quote
  #81  
KevinTheOmnivore KevinTheOmnivore is offline
Mocker
KevinTheOmnivore's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
KevinTheOmnivore is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:26 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Liberals just fabricate bullshit -- "he disagrees with me. I think he's going to get violent so let's use that as our reason to censorship and thought-police."
1. No charges were brought against him.

2. If they had been, it would've been compliant with British law.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Pharaoh Pharaoh is offline
Member
Pharaoh's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Pharaoh is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:38 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Because he was being facetious, you brick of a man.
Look you moron. I know he was being sarcastic. He said, 'Oh well it's a good thing Moderate Christians dance under the rainbows with the queers, because otherwise it might seem like every religion hates gay people...'

Sarcastically saying that every religion does hate gay people.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:40 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Typically, when people say things like "x is damaging to society, it spreads disease, etc." that implies that it should be gotten rid of. I didn't say he was going to take violent action toward homosexuals, but what he said sure makes it seem like he would if given the chance.
Good call, jerk-off.

"He disagrees with me and used strong words -- he is going to get violent."

Who is the real fascist now?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Pharaoh Pharaoh is offline
Member
Pharaoh's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Pharaoh is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:45 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Typically, when people say things like "x is damaging to society, it spreads disease, etc." that implies that it should be gotten rid of. I didn't say he was going to take violent action toward homosexuals, but what he said sure makes it seem like he would if given the chance.
Good call, jerk-off.

"He disagrees with me and used strong words -- he is going to get violent."

Who is the real fascist now?
Yeah, and he's talking about the leader of Britain's moderate Muslims. He's an Islamophobe.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Chojin Chojin is offline
was never good
Chojin's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 1999
Chojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contest
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:52 PM       
Could you two kids stop quoting each other and performing oral sex on each others' posts? It's getting kinda gross.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:53 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharaoh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Because he was being facetious, you brick of a man.
Look you moron. I know he was being sarcastic. He said, 'Oh well it's a good thing Moderate Christians dance under the rainbows with the queers, because otherwise it might seem like every religion hates gay people...'

Sarcastically saying that every religion does hate gay people.
Fine, my mistake. But my point still stands. Both of you need to do research.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:56 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Typically, when people say things like "x is damaging to society, it spreads disease, etc." that implies that it should be gotten rid of. I didn't say he was going to take violent action toward homosexuals, but what he said sure makes it seem like he would if given the chance.
Good call, jerk-off.

"He disagrees with me and used strong words -- he is going to get violent."

Who is the real fascist now?
Thanks for the paraphrase, it really captures what I was saying. I'm so glad we have you here to summarize things, or else I'd get confused.

I feel like a douche for invoking Godwin's Law AGAIN, but didn't Hitler make similar comments about the Jews and other "undesirables" in Nazi Germany? Not that I'm comparing this man to Hitler. But what he said invokes similar feelings as to the things Hitler said.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:56 PM       
LOL, we need to do research?

On what?

We're the only people presenting links, quotations, facts. etc. and you guys keep saying "You're bigots and fascists." A few folks provide links here and there, but overall the general composure of our opposition is immature repetitiono f bullshit.

Perhaps the real answer would be to report us to a group, and let them know you hve a hunch we'll get violent and commit a hate crime because we have conflicting ideas and use strong words.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 28th, 2006, 12:58 PM       
I'm getting kind of confused since you seem to be responding to things that were said a while ago. And I was talking about Phaoroah and Scru, not you. Get down off the cross, please.

Edit: Holy shit, I completely screwed up the spelling of his name. Fuck it, you get the picture.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Jan 31st, 2006, 02:22 PM       
So, what, are we done?
Reply With Quote
  #91  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jan 31st, 2006, 03:16 PM       
HE IS THE KING, SAYS TOP CAT!
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Big Papa Goat Big Papa Goat is offline
Mocker
Big Papa Goat's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Missouri
Big Papa Goat is probably a spambot
Old Jan 31st, 2006, 04:32 PM       
I love it when people say it's hypocritical to not tolerate intolerance.
__________________
Ibid
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Pharaoh Pharaoh is offline
Member
Pharaoh's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Pharaoh is probably a spambot
Old Jan 31st, 2006, 04:34 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
So, what, are we done?
Yes, thank you for taking part in the experiment.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
ScruU2wice ScruU2wice is offline
Mocker
ScruU2wice's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: thursday
ScruU2wice is probably a spambot
Old Jan 31st, 2006, 06:07 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emu
Who's censoring him? They're investigating him because he used his free speech to spew hate speech that borders on speaking his intention to take violent action agaainst homosexuals.
LOL, what violent intentions towards homosexuals?

Liberals just fabricate bullshit -- "he disagrees with me. I think he's going to get violent so let's use that as our reason to censorship and thought-police."
yeah It's not like someone ever got dragged to death and tied to a fence in the south for being gay.

I find it simply delightful that neither you or pharoh can never get a post through without mentioning the left and right, and dodging the issue by throwing "liberal lefty nutcase" bomb.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Frizzurd Frizzurd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Frizzurd is probably a spambot
Old Feb 2nd, 2006, 02:42 PM       
Remember guys it wasnt the voice of the majority that put an end to seggregation in america. Damn right its hate speach. Yes hes free to speak but were free to to call him out for it as well!
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Feb 2nd, 2006, 02:47 PM       
Thank you for that helpfully irrelevent comment.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Feb 3rd, 2006, 04:51 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Papa Goat
I love it when people say it's hypocritical to not tolerate intolerance.
It is not an issue of tolerance -- it is an issue of political freedom.

Should people have the freedom to have opinions on homosexuals? Yes!

Should it be okay in a free society for someone to believe homosexuality is immoral and spreads disease?

Yes!

If not, we are looking at Soviet era bullshit:

"Comrade Borishof reports that you have noted a dislike for homosexuals. Homosexuals are members of our new society that dismiss outdated traditional values based on ignorance. Based on Comrade Borishof's report, you will be sent to a re-education facility to learn the glorious values of the great people's revolution."

It is not fascist so much as it is Communist.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #98  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Feb 3rd, 2006, 10:21 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulturkampf
Should it be okay in a free society for someone to believe homosexuality is immoral and spreads disease?
The prejudiced belief that homosexuality is immoral is a freedom should be tolerated, but the belief that homosexuality spreads disease is pure ignorance.

FORNICATION spreads disease. If you want to argue that homosexuals fornicate more, and therefore spread more disease, well you'd be wrong, but even were that not so, it doesn't make homosexuality into some sort of pathogen.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Kulturkampf Kulturkampf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Kulturkampf is probably a spambot
Old Feb 3rd, 2006, 01:04 PM       
I do say...

It does spread disease much more due to the absolutely enormous rate of fornication amongst homosexuals (note the facts pointing at AIDS and homosexual men).

(cue previous thread)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Emu Emu is offline
Level 29 ♂
Emu's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Emu is probably a real personEmu is probably a real person
Old Feb 3rd, 2006, 01:22 PM       
When you say "enormous," what's your point of reference? Sex among heterosexuals?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.