Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #36  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Feb 20th, 2006, 12:09 PM       
Yea I posted the link to the egyptian book of the dead in this thread, also to the psychedelic Tibetan book of the dead(the tibetan book of the dead edited by timothy leary if I remember right). I really liked the tibetan book of the dead.

Both necronomicons have been called inauthentic on many occassions, yet there is still alot of recorded usage of the rituals and ceremonies. This may have something to do with the idea that most of the practicioners don't really believe in magic per se, but the ability ceremony and ritual has to control the sub-conscious and make an effectual change upon it. Some people who summon monsters from the necronomicon would probably also be inclined to summon the Harry Potter heirachy(not that they do), and according to them they would receive the same results because it is more of an intellectual mapping than a magical process.
Jung studied, practiced, wrote and even based alot of his ideas on magical bs.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.