Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Movies & Television
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
master_d_68 master_d_68 is offline
Member
master_d_68's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
master_d_68 is probably a spambot
Old Apr 22nd, 2006, 07:53 AM       
SPOILERS




Of course, it's NOT a complete adaptation of Silent Hill 1. It's already been established that elements from all of the games would be integrated into ONE film. The patient demons and the Hotel was in Silent Hill 2, Rose is dressed similar to Heather, and if you want to get REALLY technical, where was Kaufman, and why was Dahilia a tragic character instead of the main villain? I think that, even though they were proud of their film, that Gans and Avary were confident that this movie wasn't likely to please critics or generate a definite sequel, hence, the integration of elements from all of the games (hardly SH4) into one BIG film. They made this film strictly for the fans, and that's all I ever wanted.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.