Double-standards in religion

[kahljorn]

I was just thinking in terms of belief and religousity.

Agnostics don't believe there's a god.
Agnostics don't believe there's not a god.

Personally I think it's as neutral as you can get when it comes to religion. People who aren't religous obviously aren't religous, so the circumstance wouldn't really apply to them. If they were taking part in a religous debate how would they contribute? They couldn't, really, but I get your point.
I think alot of agnostics actually are irreligous, and are irreligous because they are agnostic. What's the point in thinking about it if nothing can/has been proved, after all?