PJALNE SAYS:
Quote:
|
True, but the evolutionary theory is still falsifiable and testable. Scientists have long claimed that there must have been a fish with amphibian qualities at a certain point in history. This creature must have had a primitive wrist and certain other qualities that cohere with the already established evolutionary charts. And last month they found it, and it was exactly the right age.
|
How do you feel about that, preechr?
While we're talking about that, how do you feel about dinosaurs with feathers? Or any of the other transitional fossils that have been uncovered?
P.S. the part that I feel is important about this is that they actually PREDICTED the age and qualities that the creature would have. If evolution is wrong, how is it that they have this evolutionary chart of what transitional creatures should be where at what time, and it's accurate? They have to be doing something correctly, because they are capable of predicting the evolutionary sequence. Is it coincidence? because that's a damn big coincidence. That's like guessing a complicated math question, on more than one occasion.
What I'm implying here is that their evolutionary chart they use to make predictions has been proved accurate on more than one occasion. Also, every creationist who has ever argued against evolution has said, "Where's this information/creature" and they PROVIDED IT based on their chart predictions.
Threaded Mode
