Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
cherry cherry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: under your bed with a pretzel
cherry is probably a spambot
Old Jun 26th, 2006, 02:12 PM       
'How can you say you appreciate the fictional, "philosophy presented in a work of art", existentialist novels while you think the non-fictional, "philosophy presented in a work of philosophy" is unimpressive? That's like saying I like the ideas behind this novel but I DON'T LIKE THE IDEAS'.

I do take your point, however for me philosophy must be a lived experience. A good philosopher considers new ways of being, new methods by which to live their life- and I mean live- not merely cope. Existentialism to me is a coping mechanism at best, and at worst it has been hijacked by 20 something party people who, as I stated earlier use it as an excuse for poor behaviour. and as I am now all grown up and the wrong side of 30, I think that was me back then.

besides that are plenty of examples of literature that use ethcial and philosophical principles as narrative, but I would not live my life by them. take Fight Club for example.
__________________
there had to be someone left to save to world
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.