|
|
|
BANNED
|
| |
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
|
|

Jul 11th, 2006, 12:22 AM
Let me break down what I said for you since you seem to have problems understanding the proper functioning of the english language:
"I believe the jews and many other groups considered the curse of ham to be about black people"
The reason this was brought up is because courage was talking about how the mormons use it to justify slavery. All I was merely adding in on the JEWISH side of things is that they did consider them dark skinned, as historically and anthropologically speaking the kush/hams were generally considered varying degrees of dark skinned.
"and was used as justification for their slavery"
This is obviously about mormons since that's what courage was talking about, and also about European civilizations in general. I think I mentioned that in another post.
"and as an excuse for the annhilation of canaans. Supposedly."
This is the part about the jews, I'm sure some people have definitley used it as a legitimate excuse, you recently used the excuse of, "Joshua said God said to kill them and enslave them". I probably shouldn't have used the word annhilation, but most people seem to believe they don't exist anymore.
"but it's nutty to tie it into black slavery from any angle"
Yea well no shit, don't fucking argue with me about it though it wasn't my fucking idea. I was just adding in to the conversation. Since we were discussing it I thought it's relevance as a description of the true Canaans might be applied to the problem of if Palestinians are really Canaans thus leading evidence towards validity or invalidity.
| |
__________________
NEVER
| |
|
|