Joe Lieberman and the future of the Democratic Party

[kahljorn]

I guess that depends on how you define a terrorist. If you define a terrorist as a muslim who will kill themselves to kill others Americans and allies then someday there may be an end to terror!!!!
If, however, you define a terrorist as someone(or a small group of people) dissatisfied with something trying to change it forcefully or by sabotage, then yes, we'll always have terrorism.
One could even argue that force and sabotage are not necessary to be a terrorist, in which case terrorism becomes such a loose term it could even describe the american government(not that we don't create terror in other places forcefully because we are dissatisfied with something). If terrorism is simply a political term it becomes so ambiguous... it becomes a political tool, really. One that our government isn't guiltless in using, and I can't imagine any others that are guiltless either.

"..is the person who has a "progressive" plan"

Considering the word progressive means moving forward I think that would be a good trait for any president to have on any issue. Regardless of if the administration wants to stand still, the rest of the world still moves, you know? PS I've used this word in alot of exchanges with preechr and meant it in this light, exactly. I don't think liberals are the only ones who can be "Progressive" either.