Quote:
Originally Posted by Geggy
Blanco I still stand by the retarded controlled demolition idea.
|
No matter what those pesky laws of physics say.
Quote:
I'm no structural engineer
|
Strangley, neither are any of your sources.
So, because not every mundane detail can be explained the rest of the mountains of evidence need to be ignored.
Quote:
and the coverups surrounding the collapsing of the three buildings that lead me to believe that it came down by controlled demolition.
|
How odd that people who actually work in fields like demolitions and civil engineering disagree with you.
Quote:
I rarely ever talk about it anymore because it would require observing photographic and video images and I got sick of it.
|
Or maybe because you know its bullshit and are sick of getting called on it.
Quote:
But even if it was true that the buildings came down by plane impacts and building falling next to it (WTC7), how does it not make it an inside job?
|
How the hell am I supposed to prove a negative? Where is your proof it was?
Where is the the testimony of any of the THOUSANDS (and yes, there had to be thousands) of people involved before during and after the fact?