Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
El Blanco is probably a spambot
Old Aug 30th, 2006, 07:59 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geggy
Blanco I still stand by the retarded controlled demolition idea.
No matter what those pesky laws of physics say.

Quote:
I'm no structural engineer
Strangley, neither are any of your sources.

Quote:
but it was the anamolies
So, because not every mundane detail can be explained the rest of the mountains of evidence need to be ignored.

Quote:
and the coverups surrounding the collapsing of the three buildings that lead me to believe that it came down by controlled demolition.
How odd that people who actually work in fields like demolitions and civil engineering disagree with you.

Quote:
I rarely ever talk about it anymore because it would require observing photographic and video images and I got sick of it.
Or maybe because you know its bullshit and are sick of getting called on it.

Quote:
But even if it was true that the buildings came down by plane impacts and building falling next to it (WTC7), how does it not make it an inside job?
How the hell am I supposed to prove a negative? Where is your proof it was?

Where is the the testimony of any of the THOUSANDS (and yes, there had to be thousands) of people involved before during and after the fact?
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.