Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mburbank
1.) They aren't a single unfied group, like, say, the Nazis.
|
S the fact that Persians and Arabs, governments and para-military groups spanning several nations, all bound by a single, fundamentalist view of the world,
isn't a sign of unity? What about this dreaded "Shia Crescent" I keep hearing about?
Quote:
|
2.) If they are like the Nazis, shouldn't we have a draft, war bonds, a totally redirected economy? If W believes this is in a league with that, shouldn't he be working hard to put us on the kind of WWII footing we had, concidering he's had both both houses of congress all this time?
|
Just because Bush has failed to fully put this war in perspective for Americans doesn't mean the threat isn't there.
Quote:
|
3.) They don't have the budget the Nazis had.
|
Huh? I'm not even sure what this means. I guess Hezbollah wasn't really using top of the line, British made night vision goggles and Iranian (via Russia) weaponry. Nope, just rocks and sticks.
You have some of the most oil rich nations in the world being led by Islamic radicals. How exactly do they not have the cash?
Quote:
|
4.) They don't have the army the nazis had.
|
The average age in Iran is like 28. They have a pretty big, well trained standing army. That's just Iran.
Not to mention that the Palestinian population continues to boom, and all they do is breed generation of generation of angry, brainwashed young men ready to kill Zionists and other Westerners.
Quote:
|
5.) They don't have a leader that commands loyalty on even a remote par with Hitler.
|
I dunno, anybody who can convince someone to strap a bomb around themself and take ut a bus or store is pretty "commanding."
Threaded Mode
