Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Sep 7th, 2006, 08:59 AM       
I'm pretty much anti-torture, 'cause it doesn't work any better than anything else, it tends to spread, and people really, really like doing it.

Here's the definition of torture I like to work with. Would it be okay if someone did it to an American prisoner, say a real high value one who might have knowledge of upcoming airstrikes or such?

Preech, you're aware that a small but not insignificant number of detainees have died from their interogations, right? Is that, like the definition of what's approved torture and what isn't? Like, if it was really bad for the detainee, then it was a rougue agent acting on their own, but if it didn't do a whole lot of damge then it was the good kind of okay torture?

Torture is mcuh to nasty a treat to trust these bozos with. If they don't get an enormous amount of shit for the torturing their enaged in already, they'd be torturing every Tom Dick and Harry they had in secret lock up just to invent new torture techniques.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.