|
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
|
 |
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
|
|

Sep 7th, 2006, 08:59 AM
I'm pretty much anti-torture, 'cause it doesn't work any better than anything else, it tends to spread, and people really, really like doing it.
Here's the definition of torture I like to work with. Would it be okay if someone did it to an American prisoner, say a real high value one who might have knowledge of upcoming airstrikes or such?
Preech, you're aware that a small but not insignificant number of detainees have died from their interogations, right? Is that, like the definition of what's approved torture and what isn't? Like, if it was really bad for the detainee, then it was a rougue agent acting on their own, but if it didn't do a whole lot of damge then it was the good kind of okay torture?
Torture is mcuh to nasty a treat to trust these bozos with. If they don't get an enormous amount of shit for the torturing their enaged in already, they'd be torturing every Tom Dick and Harry they had in secret lock up just to invent new torture techniques.
|
|
|
|