Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Geggy Geggy is offline
say what now?
Geggy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Peebody
Geggy is probably a spambot
Old Sep 12th, 2006, 07:15 AM       
Kahl

The 236 pieces of steel they had retrieved from the rubble only represent .25 of the 200,000 tons worth of steel from both towers. The highest temprature point in any of the steel they had in their hands were 250 degrees. So they had to rely on computer models of the towers further their analysis in which they've refused to release to the public and I find it suspicious. They've also found sulfur oxide on some of the steel they had retrieved. They also refused (or forced not) to release that info to the public. Luckily some silly 911 conspiracy kook websites cached the links of nist's findings of sulfur oxide that only explosives could have possibly produced before it was taken off the www.

I would read nist's final report but I heard it's 10 thousand pages long. I was all like, "fuuuck that!" But I did read some of the footnotes of their findings. They admit they didn't know how much damage was done to the core columns in both towers. Because the planes were made of alumnium, it would shred into pieces once they made impact into the towers. They concluded the damages to the trusses were at least minimum because the planes acted as a pin and as it entered the towers horizonally, the fuel bursted in flames outward of the towers. this is especially true for the south tower since the plane went 100 mph faster than the planw that hit north tower. The small amount of fuel that had gone inside the towers couldn't have burned for a long period of time because fuel would usauslly vaporize quickly. I guess luckily for larry silverstein, the carpets, furnitures, etc went up in flames which produced enough heat to cause the steel to lose half it's strength. Nist came to conclusion that it was the fire proofing that had been knocked off during the impact was the primrary reason for the towers giving away. I had a lot of problems with their report because they didn't cover a lot of things that characterized controlled demolition ie puff of smokes ejecting demostrating squibs, insane amount of dust produced in beginning of collapse, the complete and total collapse indicating core columns were ripped into pieces, no resistence, etc and a lot of questions were raised.

I think the steel in the wtc were grade A certified steel and it wouldn't have had mattered if the fireproof had been knocked off because grade A steel melts at 2750-3000 degrees.

I know for a fact that a lot of structiral/civil engineers who have come by 911blogger expressed their disbelief in the comment section that planes couldn't have possibly had brought down the towers alone. I believe they were legit because it looked as they knew what they were talking about. They were afraid to publicly speak out. I would be too if I knew the government was hiding something from the public and suspect that they were responsible for the murder of the thousands.

Edit: blaco yes I'm from jref and they suck. Try debatin with 50 people agaisnt you. Will come back later with more and will try find that link of nist's finding on sulfer oxide
__________________
enjoy now, regret later
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.