for geggy

[kahljorn]

I'll admit that one does fall differently, but who's to say it was terrorists who were demolating it? So if no plane struck the tower what are they officially saying happened? That the ground or ground supports were weakened by the other two falling?


"This is absurd and total junk science. If this was true, windows all around would have blown out and cracks around the concrete of the building would have been more visible."

Not really air has a habit of escaping at the easiest point possible. Where it shot out could've been a ventilation shaft, which would explain the "Every 20 floor levels" or so...

"Still doesnt explain how core columns below the impact failed and was completely pulverized into small pieces."

A buiding fell on them.

"The puff of clouds were most likely squibs that did the job of cutting the core columns below the impact to allow each falling blocks of the building to fall on top of one and another. "

Well they have that simulation check it out, I'm sure it shows how they were weakened and then the falling force of the collapse. I mean, I saw you clearly state that the simulation wasn't ever released which probably means that somewhere some conspiracy theororist engineer has been fronting that rather than analyzing it.