|
say what now?
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Peebody
|
|

Sep 20th, 2006, 12:29 PM
Wait a minute now. Are you pulling a Spiegel on me now? Of course I'm not denying the death of the innocents. Regardless of whoever did 9/11, it is still a terror attack. Where did you ever come up with the idea that I'm denying the death of the innocents?
The "what the pentagon" hit issue is irrevelant due to lack of any real, solid evidence and only 20 percent of the movement focus on it, whereas 50 percent believe a plane hit the pentagon. The media is only trying to make it seem like it is the movement's central core issue of all. They're baiting the movement by showing the public the 5 frame clip of the pentagon hit that doesn't show anything to make it for us to turn into a larger issue. It only discredits the movement as group of lunacies while they avoid other more damaging issues that shows the us govt was involved.
I find controlled demolition issue very compelling and investigations on that idea should be strongly pursued but I don't think it should be the central core issue that's so often covered by the media. They only focus on the superficial aspect of 9/11.
It was not what went down on 9/11, but the mean, motives, opportunity and the length the bush admin had gone to cover it up that convinced me it was an inside jobby. Who seem to have gain the most from the attacks? The bush administration. If it wasn't for the attacks, where would they be now? What would they have as an invocation to further their agenda?
Why hasn't one single mainstream media outlet give any attention to the high level government insider who have expressed disbelief over the commission report? I mean, why not?
|
__________________
enjoy now, regret later
|
|
|