Some media quotes

[kahljorn]

Of course you guys would take a personal issue and say NO THATS NOT TRUE AT ALL IT CANT BE TRUE ALL THE THINGS IVE BELIEVED IN MY ENTIRE LIFE.

"1. You've scoffed at the very mention of journalistic ethics. "

I didn't scoff at them I said 90% of the time they are impossible to carry out and follow, most reportors care more about getting their work done than delivering a truthful story and most newsrooms feel the same way.
I knew what journalism ethics were before this conversation started and said what they were, so let's play the game of Shut the fuck up grislypriss.

"2. You refer to all journalists as idiots"

I also said people in general are idiots so again the game grislypriss.

"3. NOW you're angry because I've called shenanigans"

I don't recall ever posting an angry emoticon.

"See above."

Well thanks for making a lengthy argument about something i already said you stupid faced queer.

"I was only making sure that you knew about it, since apparently you don't"

This thread's about Political journalism not about your mother's cunting crossword puzzles and her posting classifieds for bells the two legged cat that shits mercilessly in clothes drawers no it's POLITICAL JOURNALISM LEARN TO READ THREADS YOU PIECE OF SHIT.
I mentioned this in one of my first posts I DONT CARE ABOUT OTHER TYPES OF JOURNALISM because they are generally IMPRACTICAL. There's a fucking fire in a nightclub? What the fuck does that mean?
Political journalism is practical, and, like I said, is supposed to INFORM the masses.

" They'll be limited though, apparently all other forms of journalism only cover sports and fires. "
It also covers your mothers gaping vagina and the amount of centimeters that gape increases yearly, but you don't see me mentioning that because not only is it irrelevant but nobody cares.

"What about a riot at a ball game?"
This will effect the lives and goals of every citizen in the world.

"An offensive assumption held by many people, and this one not even a partial truth."

You're fucking stupid. Just because an association has an ethical code doesn't mean people care or even follow it.

"The only group it could possibly apply to in "journalism" would be guerrilla papparazzis. "

Yes because they are the only ones who write stories that aren't necessarily the complete truth. Every other reporter delivers the complete and whole truth.

"An offensive assumption held by many people. It's also a bullshitting tactic, by the way."

Whatever, writing that black people are smelly and that god hates them in 1923 wouldn't have been considered immoral because at the time it wasn't considered immoral. You need to learn history because I know there's tons of stories that were ran in papers about for example OPIUM causing black people to rape women mercilessly and that's partly why it's banned because the paper said that if black people took opium they would rape white people. Not because people were dying or because will-less but because it supposedly causes black people to rape white women.
Simple fact is, if nobody thinks it's immoral than nobody is going to call it immoral. Learn to read, cunthead. Don't even bother responding to me with your IM A JOURNALST WE ALL HAVE INEGREITY bullshit.

"So, by that logic, all firemen, police officers, doctors, teachers are idiots. You're completely correct."

I call teachers, firemen and policeofficers idiots all the time. Being in a position of prestige or superiority doesn't necessarily make you smart or respectable. It's just a fucking position. These are people who suddenly one day decided they needed a job to make a living and survive in a world. It's not like their entire life has been dedicated to honest journalism since they were 6 months old and they were writing bipartisan stories about the color of their shit. Shut up.
Have you ever had a job with a bunch of idiots? thank you.

"For the record, if it has ANY OPINIONS STATED WHATSOEVER, it's editorializing, not reporting. "

You can state your opinion without actually stating your opinion. Shows what you know about journalism or writing in general. did you even read what I said before?

"1. You've scoffed at the very mention of journalistic ethics."

I scoff at your banana ripened bottom you cherry favored faggot.

"You see, THIS is why I'm pissed off about your assumptions, because journalistic ethics involves giving ALL SIDES to the story. That's why it's called "ethics". "

Isn't that kind of exactly what I said at the begining of this when I said that the journalistic ethic is to report the complete, gray truth? WHOOPEE WE"VE GONE BCK IN TIME. I know what the journalistic ethic is, I just happen to know it's nearly impossible in any pointed matter.

"There are many people who are irresponsible journalists, but that DOES NOT give you free reign to simply label the entire profession as jackals"

I can do whatever I want.

And finally to wrap this thread up: All your sht about fires and sports are irrelevant. I was talking about journalistic ethics in regards to politics. Politics. Not fucking fires. Not fucking sports. Politics. The reason why newspapers exist in a democratic nation. Politics. Now you go read a few papers on the same event from different newspapers and see if theres any "Opinions" in there. Because like I said, when I read political sections I can ALWAYS see the writers opinion. It's fucking obvious 90% of the time. Now you can sit there and argue your little face off all you want but the simple fact is, POLITICAL STORIES ARE 90% OF THE TIME UNETHICAL AND PARTIAL AND THATS ALL I WAS SAYING FROM THE BEGINING AND YOU ARGUED IT BECAUSE THERES OTHER FORMS OF JOURNALISM BUT WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT THEM, HONESTLY? I fucking don't, and I wasn't talking about them. So I'd appreciate it if you'd shut your face, learn to read and respond on topic because I don't enjoy responding to things I never said.