Legality of super bullets

[kahljorn]

What kind of responses do you expect from this thread? It's not very thought provoking.

I don't really see a difference between killing someone and maiming them if they are trying to kill you. That's what happens IN THE WILD WILD WEST.
I guess if they didn't want to get killed they shouldn't have tried to kill someone else.

Isn't there some type of Kantian thing about treating people according to their own will? If they want to live in a world where it's kill or be killed, let them live accordingly. Obviously they wouldn't have held back from killing you.

I'd almost call him paranoid but I kind of understand the feeling. I don't see how it's invalid that you can defend your future by killing someone; isn't that what self-defense does in the first place? However, I wouldn't say it's just ok to kill people in the interests of your future unless your future(of being alive) is threatened; which it is if someone's trying to kill you.
Incarceration, in the first place, is basically protecting futures.. besides obviously serving the interests of justice. I think killing someone who likes to kill is "justice" though, anyway.

ps you take yourself too seriously.